Subject: Re: post cataclysm
From: joshua 'hook' corning (hook@u.washington.edu)
Date: Wed Dec 01 1999 - 12:26:26 EET
Ari Miettinen wrote: > would be low, places would be in ruins and the people/players would > have a lot to do. (Just after being relative term, I mean year to ten after > the Cataclysm.) I disagree the start of the game should start the day after or the minute after or right after the cataclysm. I hate to pull a "Mandor" but i thought at least on this point we were in agreement. I thought it was already decided. This post here by Bethel definatly states this: https://majik3d-legacy.org/mailinglist/majik-design/0673.html Also in Mandors "cataclysm desided" text he hints at this as well with this statement: "But now its time for a fresh beginning and a new start, perhaps this time the people will learn to behave" found in this e-mail: https://majik3d-legacy.org/mailinglist/majik-design/0798.html I really did not want to start this discusion about the cataclysm again and just wanted to design some descs. I have never heard anything anywhere about the game starting any significant time after the cataclysm. This is entirely new. I have to say i am fucking sick and tired of this discussion i wish it would just end. For the record the game starts right after the cataclysm as in within a 24 hour period of time. I would like everyone to note that i posted this proposal first. The obviouse advantage of this is that the world really does start new. There will be no interim time for cultures to develope that are of our design it will be all the players job to remake society in their image (with the guidance of the gods and sages of course) This was the point of the cataclysm as i recall. Please post responses to this I want to get this settled as SOON as possible. Joshua 'hook sick and tired' Corning hook@majik3d.org
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b25 : Tue Feb 12 2002 - 00:03:29 EET