Subject: Re: "small" problems with Sinister's proposal
From: Atte Koivula (yorkaturr@majik3d.org)
Date: Tue Nov 30 1999 - 10:34:28 EET
> The version me and Yorka worked out with Mirithil wasnt it? had atleast > these points : > > 1. the cataclysm was a result from mortals destroying themselfs > 2. the events HAVE TO include gods, specially new gods, since at the > moment they smell trouble and see destruction coming they start to > cover up their asses and they start to fight for their own > survivial. Since New gods created humanity and are dependent on > it, atleast to some degree. > 3. If the new gods are involved, then are the elders aswell, that is > if we want a cataclysm to happen :) Because if the elders do nothing > then new gods simply wipe out the wizards trying to destroy things. > 4. There was a massive unbalance between new gods, lesser gods, demigods > etc.. Even few of them died in the wars/chaos/what ever > 5. The end result has to include some sort of amnesia effect to deal > with players not remembering a thing. The points above are all coherent and approvable > 1. horsemen have to be included, its a good idea. > 2. there was more than 1 group of wizards, perhaps more than 2 > 3. (this is actually part of our idea aswell but): > the cataclysm should include demons, holy spirits, other monsters > etc.. As i said in some of my cataclysm post "all the evil creatures in > the world came out of hiding because gods decided to do nothing" :) And these points are also approvable, even though it's unnecessary to say so as these were in no stage against our original Cataclysm Decided! -idea. -- _/_ /Atte "Yorkaturr" Koivula <yorkaturr@majik3d.org>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b25 : Tue Feb 12 2002 - 00:03:29 EET