Re: The truth behind the Cataclysm, pt. I


Subject: Re: The truth behind the Cataclysm, pt. I
From: Kaoru Shalamberidze (ttikka@icon.fi)
Date: Mon Nov 29 1999 - 17:27:30 EET


On Mon, 29 Nov 1999, Atte Koivula wrote:

> > The post contradicts our system in just about every single point :) aside
> > from it being a nice story.
> 
> That's the fucking point!

I ment a "nice story" in a sense that it isnt so nice. Its just another
black and white copy of battle between god and evil, and it mostly ignores
everything we have decided so far :) that isnt such a good thing.
You only have to thing the social kinetics between elder, new gods and
people.. plus other creatures and you pretty soon start to realize what is
wrong.
  
> further explain the process of the Cataclysm, meaning who the wizards
> were and what they did. Ok, no mana, no spells and Gods use avatars, so
> what?

Well we can of course talk about airplanes, cars and motor vehicles here,
but it hardly has anything to do with game design. 
 
> Well the wizards DID fight against each other. How many sides is enough
> if 2 isn't? 3? 4?

You didnt even read what i said, of if you didnt you didnt get it. Its not
about the number of sides.
 
.m



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b25 : Tue Feb 12 2002 - 00:03:28 EET