Subject: Re: The truth behind the Cataclysm, pt. I
From: Kaoru Shalamberidze (ttikka@icon.fi)
Date: Mon Nov 29 1999 - 17:23:56 EET
On Mon, 29 Nov 1999, Atte Koivula wrote: > > This only proves that you STILL didnt get my point. sad. If you are unable > > to see the relations between examples, then i might aswell be talking to > > the walls. > > Personal insults are in no way constructive. Neither is plain stupidity. The best you can do is try to kick some thought process going when all else fails. Why is it so hard to undestand what i explained for 2+ pages, i can explain it again, this time better if you really like to. .m
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b25 : Tue Feb 12 2002 - 00:03:28 EET