Re: A summary of things decided


Subject: Re: A summary of things decided
From: Pekka Toppi (pot@elite.oulu.fi)
Date: Thu Dec 02 1999 - 14:22:28 EET


> > > These are not my designs, i am just the one posting these here as we
> > > agreed on the convention. Everything in that list has either been agreed
> > > on earlier or invented/agreed in the convention.
> > 
> > You have said this before yet the descs you talk about keep changing. As
> > i recall not everything you have written has not appeared on this
> > appeared on this mail list ever. Like those mirrors.
> 
> Those mirror were decided over 2 years ago and NOT BY ME, they arent even
> my own damn idea, never have been. You dont know the entire process behind
> those, and of course all of hasnt been writen on this list because some
> of the stuff where decided in real life or in majik3 chatroom.
> 
> > You keep adding
> > things and changing things to what is decided and not decided at a whim.
> > This will stop. You have written what you think has been decided so we
> > will stick to debate on those descriptions. Then we will vote. If you
> > have read the mail i sent to beregar you will note that one of the
> > "candidates" for being the moderator of this debate is that we elect no
> > moderator and keep your desc as it stands. But there will be a vote. 
> 
> I only posted the list, that list includes our agreed ideas - NOT my
> suggestions for things.
> 
These ideas are, as Mandor said in many posts, decided in the convention.
If you read the beginning of the first mail, you will notice our names
there, so how can you even try to accuse Mandor of dominating the
process? There is no need to vote since these ideas have been
already discussed AND decided. Could we just move on, please.



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b25 : Tue Feb 12 2002 - 00:03:30 EET