Subject: Re: Sages?
From: Sinister Serpent (sinister.serpent@sci.fi)
Date: Wed Dec 01 1999 - 14:26:33 EET
Kaoru Shalamberidze wrote: > On Wed, 1 Dec 1999, Sinister Serpent wrote: > > > Kaoru Shalamberidze wrote: > > > On Tue, 30 Nov 1999, Sinister Serpent wrote: > > > > > > > Again, I am facing the problem with getting informed, or rather, not > > > > getting informed. > > > > > > I think its pretty much your own problem if you dont read this mailing > > > list. There isnt any reason to whine if you dont even bother to read. > > > > Are you serious? > > Yes, either you dont even read this list, or you tend to miss alot of > important mails. > > Most of the stuff you have been arguing against have been decided a long > time ago and posted in this message : > > Date: Tue, 12 Oct 1999 17:13:59 +0300 (EEST) > From: Taneli Tikka <ttikka@icon.fi> > To: majik-design@majik3d.org > Subject: Old gods, new gods, ancients, structure of reality. > > If you are saying you dont know what has been decided there cant be much > choices, either you dont read, or you tend to miss stuff, like that post > forexample. I am not denying that I have missed certain mails in the past (because I have been busy and almost resigning) but that does not explain why I keep getting bad/useless explanations to my questions/proposals etc. I would really appreciate a good answer when I ask something. And btw. I have noticed that some things just "get decided" recently even I HAVE READ all the mails so that does not explain everything if I did not read certain post a couple of months ago. -- | ~ Sinister / Serpent of Nightside ~ | | <sinister.serpent@sci.fi> http://i.am/sinister.serpent/ | --o-- Nightside homepage: http://www.netti.fi/~halsa/ --o-- | Nightside e-mail: <nightside@hotmail.com> |
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b25 : Tue Feb 12 2002 - 00:03:30 EET