Subject: Re: Ancients (history)
From: Taneli Tikka (ttikka@icon.fi)
Date: Sun Oct 10 1999 - 21:16:44 EEST
On Sun, 10 Oct 1999, Tommi Leino wrote: > On Sun, 10 Oct 1999, Taneli Tikka wrote: > > > of course we have NPC-gods.. deities who arent played by humans, who are > > characters only because of the story and because of makin pantheon whole. > > otherwise we would now have a nasty unbalance in the world :) being > > aluna+dazzt versus sinister+harum+yorkaturr+mandor.. not quite fair. > > I think we can easily get enough volunteers to take up God characters, so > I say no for NPC gods. Besides aluna+dazzt can be more powerful than the > evil combo and also we need not to have balanced pantheon. If the evil > side is more powerful then the world begin as more horrible place to live. okay this was supposed to be my other option :) so i can agree with this Lets just keep the pantheon as it is. I think anyone is a bit reluctant to elevate newbies straight to godhood, but surely there are lots of demigod places avail. And iv also said in my previous mails that dazzt is more powerful than any single evil god (not including sinister thou) which suits me just fine -m
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b25 : Tue Feb 12 2002 - 00:03:20 EET