Subject: Re: Vote
From: joshua 'hook' corning (hook@u.washington.edu)
Date: Thu Dec 02 1999 - 13:21:41 EET
Kim Kunnas wrote: > > I accept all things which Mandor explained since they all > sound reasonable and are based (at least most of them) on > things we have discussed earlier and agreed, they also > fit well together. > > I really hope we can agree these things without too much > whining and complaints since I have no patience to follow > other lenghty debates concerning these things. > > Amen > > - Beregar (Beregar@Majik3D.org) The purpose of the vote is to eliminate complaints to these "decisions" Once and for all. They are also to set in stone what is decided and what isn't decided. This thing has changed in Mandor's and others minds for the final time. What Mandor has written down is a good map for what to exactly debate and decide upon. But they will be decided upon in an OPEN forum in a specific point by point manor. Nothing will be added or deleted to what Mandor has written. There will be no more "other" descs added to this as side things without it being first only a proposal. If you wish to nominate that the desc Mandor has written not be debated but kept "as is" I as moderator for the nomination of moderator will ALLOW this as ONE of the candidates to be voted on. But mind you there will be a VOTE. And what is decided from that vote will stand. This is the only way to put these issues behind us so we can get on with game design. Again anyone who wants to make nominations for moderator of the debate and voting of the points of the Mandor "Decisions desc" please post them. Joshua 'hook' corning hook@majik3d.org
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b25 : Tue Feb 12 2002 - 00:03:30 EET